{"id":4133,"date":"2023-07-17T07:21:55","date_gmt":"2023-07-17T07:21:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thepafp.org\/journal\/?post_type=abstract&p=4133"},"modified":"2023-07-17T07:21:55","modified_gmt":"2023-07-17T07:21:55","slug":"stand-of-the-pafp-on-pgmec-as-the-accrediting-body-for-medical-specialty-training-in-the-new-physicians-act","status":"publish","type":"abstract","link":"https:\/\/thepafp.org\/journal\/abstract\/stand-of-the-pafp-on-pgmec-as-the-accrediting-body-for-medical-specialty-training-in-the-new-physicians-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Stand of the Â鶹ֱ²¥ on PGMEC as the Accrediting Body for Medical Specialty Training in the New Physicians Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Stand of the Â鶹ֱ²¥ on PGMEC as the Accrediting Body for Medical Specialty Training in the New Physicians Act<\/h2><\/div>

John Michael Deblois MD, CFP, and the Â鶹ֱ²¥ Health Policy Analysis Committee<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>

View Full Text<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Policy Question<\/strong><\/p>\n

How should medical specialties (PGME and training) be accredited and regulated? Should it be by government, non-profit physicians\u2019 specialty organization etc.?<\/p>\n

Methods to Answer the Policy Question<\/strong><\/p>\n

To answer this policy question, the Â鶹ֱ²¥ Health Policy Analysis Committee conducted a literature search with the following terms \u201cmedical specialties\u201d AND \u201caccreditation\u201d AND (organization OR administration). Below are the key points of the meetings and relevant publications reviewed.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,72],"tags":[16],"class_list":["post-4133","abstract","type-abstract","status-publish","hentry","category-abstract","category-abstract-2023-volume-61-issue-1","tag-abstract"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t